What's your guiding principle for building movements that thrive sustainably over decades?
Sometimes, late at night, when the city quieted at last, I'd find myself sifting through the wreckage of another day's news, wondering how movements survive. It was tempting to think of resistance as something sharp and sudden, a flash that catches the eye, breaks the spell. But more and more, I felt myself drawn toward something slower, something built not from fleeting images and sounds but from deeper pulses beneath the surface. Why not imagine a revolution tethered to patience, something enduring not because it is loud, but because it is resonant?
I'd read about Micah White's "minoritarian principle" somewhere between the dishes and the laundry, a theory nudging revolutionary tactics toward the margins, toward edges blurry with intersection and mingling ideologies. "The majority does not follow its center," he wrote, "it undulates toward its inspirational edges." Undulates, I thought. To bend and move in waves. How lovely, that image of crowds pulled not by certainty but by the magnetic hesitation of edges.
"The Slow Future" came next, joining this cautious wonder. Change, it suggested, didn't burst into being fully formed; it spread quietly, seeping into generations behind us, ahead of us. We could learn to think beyond ourselves, could nurture our protests like patient gardeners, watering them daily until long after we were gone—movements speaking not just to shoulders brushed in today's marches but also to souls not yet arrived onto the earth. To craft revolutionary narratives strong enough to outlast us, maybe even memory itself.
But then what does it look like, really, when the adrenaline fades, when we step past candles and slogans into day-to-day planning? The hard truth about activism, I'd learned through small heartbreaks and fleeting excitement, was that fury itself was never enough. I remembered Occupy Wall Street—how we scattered later into confusion, unsure where to channel the raw energy we'd briefly captured. It wasn't about just being angry, not anymore; it was about building structures, creating shared, magical spaces where activism rooted itself deeply in a slower soil.
Listen to the edges, someone told me once. It's where hope leaks quietly in. Try meme warfare, whispered another voice, laughter threading through each syllable. Funny but profound. Stories, symbols, jokes—these things slip past the armor, planting tiny seeds that grow during sleepless nights, sudden bursts of insight. The ripple, I thought, remembering my daughter throwing stones into the pond, watching circles spread gently outward. A small act now—maybe that’s all we needed.
We'd also have to surrender some ideas about control. Horizontal, messy leadership instead of clean hierarchies—leadership scattered among the many rather than focused onto the shoulders of a fragile few. A structure resilient enough to withstand time, burnout, ego. Maybe these activist circles would practice rituals—not just protests—in their hidden corners, fostering moments of quiet liberation, staring inward long enough to understand how deeply private our battles really are.
The edges hold contradictions together: activism steeped in both the political and the spiritual, sharpened by both practical action and strange metaphysical leaps. It's about shaking not just systems, but core assumptions about who and why and how we exist. "Metapolitical targets," another strange phrase caught in my notebook—rights not only for people, but for rivers, animals, ecosystems, maybe even machines. Realizing revolution might require a widening of imagination to let in all the hidden beings and forces that won't fit neatly onto our old maps.
Late that night, after I'd turned off my phone, I wrote down one more phrase, softly, like a whispered promise: "sudden leaps towards alternate futures." This, perhaps, was where sustainable activism lived—not certainty, but instinctive leaps into unknown, unseen worlds. Future narratives sustained not by victory but by a persistent, stubborn beauty lurking past logic. Past fear.
Movements that last, I saw finally, were those woven slowly, gently, from the quiet edges inward, breathing with their own patient rhythms, waiting for an unseen future to catch and carry their gentle, persistent dreams forward.
• • •
The Brazilian Landless Workers' Movement (Movimento Sem Terra, MST) provides a nuanced historical example of a protest movement that successfully bridged the spiritual and socio-political dimensions, embodying elements of deep moral commitment and a comprehensive, visionary patience for long-term change. Established in the early 1980s, the MST drew heavily from liberation Christianity, a theological framework advocating social justice and prioritizing the empowerment of the poor. Despite maintaining a secular and independent identity, its foundational inspiration was the Pastoral Land Commission (CPT), deeply rooted in liberation theology. The MST used rituals, symbols, and collective experiences—marches, celebrations, processions—to express their internally cohesive "mystique," which members identified as their emotional commitment, moral integrity, and readiness to risk their lives for transformative social change. This "mystique" reflected a secularized religious belief in a utopian future, described as a "Kingdom" of justice and fraternity, radically differing from capitalism. However, the movement deftly intertwined utopian hopes with immediate practical and rational goals, using collective organic farming projects, democratically self-managed encampments, and strategic negotiations to achieve concrete outcomes. Their horizontal leadership structures, radical inclusivity, and intricate symbolic practices allowed a multi-generational vision of social change to persist, situating the MST as a benchmark not only in Brazil but also as an influential standard for global civil society's struggles against neoliberalism.