How do you prioritize emotional well-being within intense activist environments?
In certain dreams, one marches forever, shouting slogans into a wind that will not carry them. I used to picture activists as fearless first responders to history's perpetual crisis, those willing to move relentlessly toward danger. Yet activism, layers deep, is mostly unglamorous tension, an aching kind of urgency. Micah White called it “the suppressed collective creativity of humanity," something magnificent, transformative, hidden beneath waves of weariness and anxiety. But how do you sustain yourself when the battle is inside as well as out? The real revolution, White says, is "inside our minds," echoing certain mystics who understood that no real change happens without first shifting your internal weather.
Somehow, what I learned along the way was that protest marches are not simply performances for power to behold—but mirrors. FiheMaFih once said, "If you find fault in your brother or sister, that fault is already in yourself." I scribbled this quote once into a borrowed notebook, a whispery sort of truth. Yet it struck me suddenly—activism as reflective practice—the very thought felt brave, maybe foolishly hopeful. But still.
We step into movements and become attuned; emotional currents traveling between us like weather patterns. White calls this emotional contagion and warns of it but also praises it. When aligned, we emit “limitless possibility, eternal love, fearlessness," and perhaps this ripple outward becomes as contagious as rage or despair. Sometimes, working within such intensity feels like watching a planet—sometimes blazing, sometimes dwindling—to which you are inextricably tethered. Emotional wellness doesn't arrive like success or outcomes, doesn't follow policy victories or viral hashtagging. It demands an uneasy embrace of self-reflection, of rituals and rest, even as chaos pulls relentlessly outward.
I knew a person once—we marched together many times—who said we must practice what he called mental environmentalism. He meant curating narratives, pushing aside the toxic dark narratives flooding our thinking. Maybe he knew activists who burned brightly for a season, then flickered out, drained by anxiety and despair. He proposed something radical—normalizing emotional transparency and vulnerability; voicing weakness not as failure but as evidence of our humanity. Surprising me how the simplest idea, spoken aloud, felt nearly revolutionary.
He organized reflective retreats, long pauses in action spaces. Art and music entered subtly and seeped into the cautious silences between strategies. Solidarity workshops emerged—spaces built intentionally for emotional check-ins—because he believed deeply in connection, affectionate cooperation. Each step felt awkward at first, like forcing yourself to dance sober in daylight. But the shifts happened quietly, until over months and seasons activists began cultivating not only protest’s loud outer showing but also tending our invisible interior gardens. White reminds us that the greatest measure of activism isn't definitive victories alone, but rather "achieving massive change through collective action" grounded in compassion and deepening relationships.
Once, I heard activists reference oddly-timed rituals: indigenous ghost dancing, choir singing, poetry readings amid fierce demonstrations. At first, all that seemed disconnected, extraneous, but watch patiently enough and you see beauty quietly stitching itself into fabric designed for endurance. Micah Bornfree, speaking on Occupy Wall Street, remembered passionately that activism echoes "a raw, emotional need to be free," tied intimately to the bonds activists form in shared striving. I understand—these bonds protect us, form invisible shelters against inevitable anguish.
Occasionally, someone suggests rest, unironically termed "radical rest," a kind of daring pause. No one believes it possible until it happens, briefly—rest woven deliberately into the noise. It still feels vulnerable, dangerous even, like pausing your breath underwater. But we learn over time—we learn rest is no less revolutionary than running full tilt toward oppression itself.
In the end, emotional well-being isn't peripheral—can't be only tangential if we mean activism to remain sustained, authentic, exquisite. Activism as revolutionary care. How different activism would seem if we saw our work no longer as firefighting alone, but as carefully planting seeds in places scorched bare—moving outward only from gardens deeply nourished. What remains, quietly, after noise fades? A tapestry of friendships; days when activism empties into something as simple, patient, and miraculous as growing a garden slowly from ashes—vision renewed, steadying the restless self enough to carry forward again.
• • •
A notable historical case demonstrating the integration of emotional and spiritual resilience into activist strategy is the movement of the Argentinian mothers of La Plaza de Mayo beginning in 1977. Following the brutal military regime established in 1976, where widespread disappearances of civilians created a climate of terror, a group initially composed of just 14 women commenced weekly symbolic marches, publicly displaying personal belongings and photographs of their disappeared relatives. Their approach was inherently emotional—visually and viscerally evoking personal loss to challenge state oppression. When direct state repression nearly extinguished their movement, driving protests underground and seemingly into decline, the mothers shifted tactics, focusing their activism inward. They regrouped privately within the protective spaces of parish churches, relying heavily on prayer and emotional support as crucial components of their radical strategy. This period of emotional nurturing and spiritual reflection preceded another public confrontation in 1979, where their re-emergence, fortified by internally cultivated resilience, garnered global attention and led to thousands joining their ranks. The mothers of La Plaza de Mayo thus illustrate how placing emotional and spiritual well-being centrally within activist strategy not only sustains participants through adversity but may significantly bolster the broader transformative power of collective action.