Can activism reconstruct cultural myths defining entire civilizations?
To tell a story is to imagine another lifeworld—an invisible one, perhaps, waiting quietly under the surface of this stubborn, mundane reality. But to tell it honestly is to confront a blindness we hardly ever want to see.
I once heard it described as a kind of collective reflex—a flinch in the dark—civilization, wrapped neatly in the myths we spin and repeat to ourselves. FiheMaFih says civilization is built precisely because we turn away, because we refuse to look directly, as if those shadows, once faced, would unravel who we are. So we exist, he says, always on the edges of a comfortable blindness, preserving our stories at the expense of truth. Jacques Ellul called it something harsher—"harsh and vulgar reality"—masked beautifully, convincingly, beneath idealistic political myths. These illusions protect us from discomfort, yes, but quietly, beneath our notice, they also uphold injustice, justify cruelty, and accelerate ecological ruin.
At its most profound, activism confronts this blindness. It calls out our myths, not with policy and incremental change, but by aiming straight at collective imagination itself—not just rewriting the small print, but telling a different story entirely. Micah White says it's not just fast protests we need now, but slow movements, patient enough to sculpt memories and myths over generations. Think of it as a long conversation—murmured by candlelight, echoed across time, each sentence an invitation into another vision of the world. Imagine the possibility that our small rebellions, our creative refusals, might plant a seed.
But of course, it isn’t easy to change what’s invisible, deeply imprinted, comfortably shaped by history and habit. The trick, perhaps, is embracing activism as a quiet kind of alchemy. What we’re after is a deeper, spiritual insurrection—one that begins internally. After all, what are myths but shared stories we accept without question, stories we embody because they seem inevitable?
If activism had a true calling, it might be this: to make space in our imagination for what we never knew we needed. To renew myths from the inside out, not just toppling old governance structures but cautiously untangling psychological threads and spiritual barriers, allowing ourselves to respond differently to questions of identity, economics, power, ecology—even, perhaps, our place in the cosmos.
But even visionaries require strategies. I've witnessed it lately, the activists moving quietly toward something deeper, more elusive: battling not just for opinions or policies but for shifts in collective imagination. Some speak of a new era of meme warfare, a contagion of ideas created by artists and thinkers, spread like invisible ink into the testament of society. Inspired messages, shared quietly, evoking epiphanies that shift entire perceptions, shaking loose our internalized stories like wet leaves on an autumn day.
There is also talk now of activists who see beyond immediate outcomes, who write manifestos intended only for future generations. Their work is not just revolutionary—it is archival, patient. Paper placed quietly in bottles, slipped silently into the stream of time, delivered at precisely the right future moment. Understanding that liberation exceeding one lifetime requires humility and trust.
There are others too, who have begun to build spaces specifically for this purpose—community centers, cooperatives, co-living zones, entire liberated corners of culture—for incubating and propagating these richer myths. Safe spaces, these activists call them, but that phrase doesn’t quite do them justice. They’re shelters against a more subtle storm: the storm that relentlessly tries to lure us back into numb obedience.
And finally, there are those bizarre activists who look to the distant future—to meta-political targets beyond usual partisan divisions. They consider the nature of consciousness, rights for non-human entities, space settlement and quantum physics, applying revolutionary imagination to frontiers that politics traditionally ignore. It seems peculiar at first, until you realize the strategy here is elegant, even profound: reshape pockets of our imaginations through unconventional visions, teaching ourselves to think entirely around imposed boundaries.
What then is the theory of change underneath this quiet insurrection? Perhaps activism, at its best, is not railing loudly against the state, but quietly cultivating alternative mythologies that, with time, gently corrode the old, brittle stories until they crumble into irrelevance. Over generations, like water slipping between stones, these new stories accumulate. Whispered softly, remembered fiercely, shared silently with nods across crowded rooms. Until one day we notice they've shaped us invariably, irresistibly into a new paradigm, and we hardly know when it happened.
Activism then becomes an exercise in radical patience: understanding that a civilization is nothing else but stories we choose, consciously or not, to embrace. To change the myths—the stories we whisper to ourselves in the dark—that could be activism’s deepest power: quietly nudging humanity toward a truth we’ve long yearned to face.
• • •
A striking historical illustration of how activism can reconstruct cultural myths is evident in the American Indian Red Power movement spanning the late 1960s to 1980s. Key events, particularly the occupation of Alcatraz Island from 1969 to 1971, markedly redefined the cultural narrative surrounding Native Americans. Rather than accepting imposed images of marginalization and victimization, Native American activists directly contested broadly propagated derogatory stereotypes and promoted an empowered, valued cultural heritage. These sustained symbolic actions led to profound internal transformations within Indigenous communities, sparking a vibrant cultural renaissance evident in increased native newspapers, popular music, radio programs, and creative arts—both traditional and contemporary. Beyond these internal revitalizations, the idealistic yet confrontational stance adopted by the activists reshaped national perceptions, contributing significantly to more nuanced portrayals of Native Americans in education, the media, and mainstream consciousness. This narrative shift ultimately cemented itself in American institutional memory through tangible legacies such as the National Museum of the American Indian, established prominently in Washington, DC. Thus, the Red Power movement exemplifies how sustained activism can catalyze society-wide transformations by reshaping prevailing cultural myths and elevating marginalized identities into positions of influence and respect.